Talk:Réunion parakeet

Réunion parakeet is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Extinction

This redirect is a part of WikiProject Extinction, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on extinction and extinct organisms. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this redirect, or visit the project page for more information.ExtinctionWikipedia:WikiProject ExtinctionTemplate:WikiProject ExtinctionExtinction articles

Merge with echo parakeet?

It seems like this is currently regarded as either a subspecies of or identical to the echo parakeet. Even if it is a distinct subspecies, those are usually not kept as separate articles (unless a lot can be written about them, as is impossible in this case), so either way, the articles should probably be merged. The issue was discussed here[1] previously, but I forgot to make the point that even if the subspecies are distinct, they should be merged. FunkMonk (talk) 05:00, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since no one has objected to it I'd say go for it... Probably best to do it or not do it and take the banner down off the article. Sabine's Sunbird talk 06:07, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thinking of expanding the article for FAC at some point, so I'll merge them there, but yeah, as long as there is agreement, the tags are not needed. FunkMonk (talk) 08:50, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]