Jump to content

Talk:Quique (album)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 20:09, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, I'll take this one and will mainly focus on copyediting issues. I should complete this within a day or two Jaguar 20:09, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Initial comments

[edit]
  • There is no "format" in the infobox? Was it relased on both CD and vynl?
  • "The album was recorded in July 1993 and released in December" - December later that year
  • "where it received positive reviews from the British press" - from the press? What about music critics?
  • The lead could be expanded slightly in order to summairse the article (a solid requirement for GA). It's looking a little dry on the production side of things, so that part could be expanded?
  • "Mark Clifford formed Seefeel in 1992 after posting ads for potential group members" - informal, how about advertisements?
  • "Quique was re-released on vinyl on 27 August 2013" - this wasn't mentioned in the lead?
  • It's not that large of a deal and the re-issue didn't really cause that much of a stir. I'll see what I can do when I expand the lead about a bit.
  • "Spin '​ Simon Reynolds" - is that a typo?

References

[edit]
Fixed on my end. Might be weird due to the filter. Might remove and just add a quote if it's still giving people problems. Andrzejbanas (talk) 23:12, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On hold

[edit]

The prose on this article is looking pretty solid, but other than that the lead could be expanded slightly and there were also a few minor prose issues I found. I'll leave this on hold for the standard seven days, even thought I'm sure it won't need that. Thanks! Jaguar 21:45, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Close - promoted

[edit]

Thank you for addressing all of them, after reading through the article again it now meets the GA criteria. It is broad, comprehensive and the information is accurate from the sources given. Well done Jaguar 13:34, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]