Talk:Quincy Method
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Quincy Method article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]The NYT article states that the Quincy model encourages learning by doing ie. writing words over and over and over again. So I don't think it's accurate to say he opposed rote learning. He opposed oral spelling (for the first two years of study, according to the article) and opposed the use of spelling books, but he was a strong supporter of learning by copying and mechanical repetition with accuracy (which is an example of rote learning as I understand the term). Although its short, the article could also be better cited. Some of the language used seems to be from a fixed point of view that is laudatory rather than being strictly descriptive and encyclopedic. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:09, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- Until I included the word "excelled" (taken from a cited source and added to the article 20 minutes after you wrote the above), please give an example of "laudatory rather than being strictly descriptive and encyclopedic." --Technopat (talk) 19:40, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class education articles
- Mid-importance education articles
- WikiProject Education articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- Start-Class Massachusetts articles
- Mid-importance Massachusetts articles
- WikiProject Massachusetts articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class Chicago articles
- Mid-importance Chicago articles
- WikiProject Chicago articles