Jump to content

Talk:Quincy, Washington

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Error in page

[edit]

The math of the demographics does not add up. There are aboiut 65% of the population white, but also about 65% of the population Hispanic. How can this be so?

Answer: Many Hispanics are white and would fall under both categories. Remember Latin America was colonized by Europeans so white Hispanics would most likely be from primarily Spanish ancestry (White) rather than native american. This is why many forms want to differentiate so they list "White" and "Non-white Hispanic." --Borphos 22:55, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've lived there, and I can say anecdotally that the town is definitely made up of more than 50% Hispanics. The 65% figure sounds spot-on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.103.158.14 (talk) 01:34, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Geography? The following may not belong under geography:

"This is a very respectable place. And is really taking off in terms of its size and popularity with all the local happenings. Quincy even had its own article in the Wall Street Journal in early March."

Suggest moving the section and possibly making it more encyclopedic rather than commentary. But all in all, a good page. Very informative. --Borphos 20:52, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Under construction

[edit]

Some unsourced material will be on this page for a while until it can be properly sourced. Please pardon some unencyclopedic errors as I work to build the encyclopedia. Jsharpminor (talk) 01:19, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note to self: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania is a good small town FA model. Minneapolis is a FA about a bigger city. Jsharpminor (talk) 02:26, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Quincy, Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]