Talk:QuickC

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Microsoft Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

how can the first release in 1987 implement the ANSI C standard released about two years later? Was it based on a draft?

Upward revisions in a language generally stem from individual compiler developers and spread to others, with each of them looking over one anothers' shoulders. The primary task of the standardization process is to codify common, already-existing and de facto uses and conventions, rather than to create or impose new ones; and many of these same developers are involved in the creation of the formal standard.

QuickC vs. Microsoft C

In the article there should be some information about how Quick C differs from Microsoft C, which was 3-4 times as expensive. As far as i found out, Quick C was only able to compile DOS programs. While the more expensive Microsoft C version could also compile programs for Windows and OS/2. But what else was different? What about the editor, debugger and support libraries? Can anyone tell something more about that? --93.229.162.195 (talk) 06:01, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]