Talk:Quest KACE

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Comments

Reads like a marketing piece (detailed comparison of storage within current product line, describing underlying OS as using "widely used proven technology", etc.)

Is it acceptable to leave the com

Removing the two main product-lines

The company has almost all the time split it's products in two main product-lines: the KBox1000 for application management (+helpdesk functionality) and the KBox 2000 for OS deployment. That within these two main lines the individual products are removed is -imho- defendable, but to remove the two main product-lines is -again imho- an overreaction. Tonkie (talk) 19:38, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of product lines

In the past WhiWaWiz deleted all mentioned product/series-numbers and I could very well live with that. Since then it was replaced by the two or three quite static main product-lines that include entirely different systems, but apparently someone though again to delete that without giving any good reason why (at least imho). As said: I fully agree that Wikipedia shouldn't be a list of available models, submodels and features. But if you can't mention the main product lines that are completely different products it is like deleting Windows Server, Exchange and XBox from the Microsoft page as it is all computers..... Tonkie (talk) 17:01, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dell KACE. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120509234511/http://www.networkworld.com/news/2007/092707-kace-kbox-virtual.html to http://www.networkworld.com/news/2007/092707-kace-kbox-virtual.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:38, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Quest Software Logo.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:53, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]