Jump to content

Talk:Quarrington, Lincolnshire/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MPJ-DK (talk · contribs) 03:06, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Alright I will be picking up the review of this one - both for the Wiki Cup and the GA cup as well.

Side note, I would love some input on a Featured List candidate (Mexican National Light Heavyweight Championship) and a Featured Article candidate (CMLL World Heavyweight Championship). I am not asking for Quid pro Quo, but all help is appreciated.  MPJ-US  03:06, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alright I will be picking up the review of this one - both for the Wiki Cup and the GA cup as well.

Side note, I would love some input on a Featured List candidate (Mexican National Light Heavyweight Championship) and a Featured Article candidate (CMLL World Heavyweight Championship). I am not asking for Quid pro Quo, but all help is appreciated.  MPJ-US  04:25, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Toolbox

[edit]

I like to get this checked out first, I have found issues using this that has led to quick fails so it's important this passes muster.

Peer review tool
  • Nothing that actually applies to the article. Green tickY
Copyright violations Tool
Disambiguation links
  • No issues Green tickY
External links
  • The following links are dead
  • 27 – I assume this means reference 27? If so, then that link is working. I have added an archived link.
  • 59 – Archive link provided.
  • 78 – Archive link provided.
  • 80 – Archive link provided.
  • 65 – Archive link provided.
  • 89 – Archive link provided.
  • 99 – Archive link provided.
  • Connection issues
  • Link to metoffice.gov.uk – working fine for me
  • Parliament.uk – working fine for me

Well Written

[edit]
Lead
  • "Anglo-Saxon period, while mills" does not need the comma
    • Done
  • "In the 19th century the" comma after century
    • Done
Early
  • "material has been" I believe "have" is appropriate here
    • Done
  • "pottery sherds", I assume that is supposed to be "shards"??
  • "ten mills in" should be 10 since you use 11 and 12 in the same sentence
    • Done
  • "the 11 or 12" 11th? 12th?
    • Sorry, but I can't see a problem with this sentence.
Early and later modern
  • "with exception of" should be "with the exception of"
    • Done
  • "By 1872 the" should be "By 1872, the"
    • Done
  • "In 1879 Lord Bristol" should be "In 1879, Lord Bristol"
    • Done
  • "sold much farmland" should that be "sold much of their farmland"
    • Done
Topography
  • "and the to north" should be "and to the north"
    • Done
Economy
  • "the population, while" does not need the comma
    • Done
Demographics
  • "it were divided" should be "was", singular as it refers back to "the population"
    • No, it refers to the population statistics: "the population statistics for the new Sleaford parish[,] which absorbed it[,] were divided into four wards".
  • "Instead a church" should be "Instead, a church"
    • Done

Sources/verifiable

[edit]
  • Generally looks reliable and well formed Green tickY

Broad in coverage

[edit]
  • Looks like it's generally hitting the various sections normally in this type of articles. Green tickY

Neutral

[edit]
  • It is very factual. straight forward, not prone to embellishment etc.

Stable

[edit]
  • I don't see any evidence of edit wars in the history, granted it has an extensive history but nothing jumped out at me. Green tickY

Illustrated / Images

[edit]
  • Images need Alt text
  • Licenses check out Green tickY

@Noswall59: - I have completed my review, really not a lot of issues found. I would say that the article is 99% right now. So I will put it on hold for 7 days to allow you to work on it.  MPJ-US  20:58, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MPJ-DK: Thank you very much for taking the time to review this article. I have addressed most of your comments through these edits, but I have queried two or three of your points (see above). Cheers, —Noswall59 (talk) 11:43, 15 March 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Yep,looks good to me @Noswall59:. Passing for GA, congratulations.  MPJ-US  14:55, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]