Talk:Quantum error correction

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as High-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Talk

Would be nice if someone put a more detailed description of Shor's, Steane's, and the 5-qubit codes, as well as possibly Gottesman's stabilizer trickery, together with pretty pictures of quantum circuits. I will try to do that, provided I have enough time. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.156.154.50 (talk • contribs) 03:19, 14 January 2005.

Theoretically, I could add a lot of information here and on the articles for the more important codes. I'm not promising anything, though! Melchoir 02:10, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It has been almost six years since your request and I just added some "pretty pictures of quantum circuits". Bender2k14 (talk) 01:27, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shor's code should have its own Wikipedia article, as should have the Bacon-Shor code. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.97.120.172 (talk) 18:23, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

General Question

Can a quantum error code of any variety correct the error in a and b of a qubit a |0> + b |1> ? It doesn't appear that any projective measurement will be able to correct an unknown error in "a". For clarity of the subject, this question ought to be addressed in the article by some expert. Cryptonaut 03:39, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Think of the error as a quantum operation on the original state. Measuring the syndrome collapses this operation into a correctible error. The article actually does, in my opinion, a very good job of explaining this. 71.77.1.215 06:26, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Approaches Other Than the Stabilizer Formalism?

Right now this topic only seems to mention the stabilizer formalism for correcting quantum errors, which can be a bit misleading. Even if the other approaches to quantum error correction aren't delved into in-depth, it should at least be mentioned that the stabilizer formalism misses some correctable quantum errors that other approaches catch. (As a perfect example, the 3-qubit channel with 3 Kraus Operators Z1, Z2 and Z3 would not give even a single-qubit correctable code under the stabilizer formalism (I think), but actually admits a 2-qubit perfectly correctable code). 131.104.9.166 18:19, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a section titled "General codes" which will hopefully expand to address this issue. I have only put the definition of a correctable subspace for now, but things like correctable subsystems and the Knill-Laflamme conditions would fit naturally into this section. JokeySmurf (talk) 15:55, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The figure about the bit flip code

The right most CNOT gate has two inputs. But the vertical input comes from the outputs of two previous CNOT gates. What if the two CNOT gates output different values?

In the example, there are 4 projectors. If we apply P0, the outcome will be zero. Doesn't that collapse the state of three qubits? I understand that P1 doesn't for the error scenario (the first qubit is flipped). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.43.92.66 (talk) 00:33, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The CNOT-like symbol on the right is actually a Toffoli gate, or CCNOT gate. As an aside, a CNOT has two inputs---the target bit and the control bit. A Toffoli gate has three inputs---two controls and a target. Salelder (talk) 02:35, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it would be helpful to put links to the list of gates on https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Quantum_logic_gate as part of the figure captions? User:jqt (Feb 2022) — Preceding undated comment added 11:56, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Standarize Pauli matrices

Either use $X,Y,Z$ or $\sigma _{x},\sigma _{y},\sigma _{z}$ but not both.--ReyHahn (talk) 16:34, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also these matrices should be defined at the beggining and not in some intermediate section.--ReyHahn (talk) 09:50, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Punk physicist (talk) 17:32, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New equation for quantum feedback error correction

Now, physicists have developed a "master equation" that will help engineers understand feedback at the quantum scale. Their results are published in the journal Physical Review Letters.(source:Phys.org) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.34.110.31 (talk) 16:39, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup?

This article is a bit of a mess, including various codes in an ad hoc manner and not describing the general outline of this area.

For example there is an overabundance of emphasis on Bosonic codes, but little mention of stabilizer codes, topological codes, and quantum LDPC codes.

The final topic on QEC without encoded parity check is also very out of place. 2018ag37 (talk) 17:39, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, can you work on it?--ReyHahn (talk) 18:03, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]