Talk:Qualifications-Based Selection

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyright

In case this comes up again, [1] copied this article and not the other way round. Hut 8.5 16:46, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This Article is Original in Content

I created this article in summer 2007. Since that time, several websites have "borrowed" my content and placed it on their spaces. I do not mind most of these because I want this content to be in the public domain.

I do object, however, to websites whose owners take my material and place their "copyright" on my intellectual property. [2] did just that. They should remove their false copyright or else remove my article. Kimballp (talk) 01:54, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Send them an email. They are obliged to license the material under the GNU Free Documentation License and acknowledge who wrote it. Hut 8.5 17:50, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Header of "Impetus" vs. "Impetus of QBS"

The section is about the impetus of QBS and seems better to be phrased that way, which I chose when I wrote the article originally. I hope that you will leave the header the way I wrote it unless you can explain why the deletion of the subject in the header is somehow to the advantage of the reader. Thank you. Kimballp (talk) 17:46, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Qualifications-Based Selection" does not need definite article "the"

As a noun phrase, "Qualifications-Based Selection," and, by extension, the phrase's abbreviation "QBS," has no need for the definite article preceding the phrase or abbreviation. The phrase is analogous to "Major League Baseball" as a noun phrase. One would not insert the definite article, "the," in front of MLB when it is used as a noun phrase. For the same reason, it should not be done to QBS used in the same capacity. Thank you. Kimballp (talk) 18:10, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of link to commercial website selling forms software

Someone added a new section to the article that discusses the existence of electronic forms that would allow firms to submit their qualifications and other information electronically to solicitors for professional services. While I (as the original author of the main article) have serious reservations that this new section on electronic submission of documents is truly worthy of inclusion as germane to the main topic, for the time being I am leaving it to other editors to consider. Though ambivalent, I am thinking that, perhaps, the new section does no harm.

That said, the new section contained a reference next to "Electronic Submittal Process (QBS)" that linked to a commercial website selling software forms. That reference was an inappropriate use of this article as a launching pad for a business. For that reason, I deleted the reference.

The deleted link's displayed text was "GovernmentForms.manager," and the address was to www.sf330.com. At that site, the site title is "GovernmentFormsSoftware" and the links are to www.enlightenedsoftware.com.

I kindly ask that this article on qualifications-based selection not be allowed to contain links to commercial websites or other businesses seeking to profit on traffic to this Wikipedia article by selling stuff.

If the author of the section on "Electronic Submittal Process" would like to create a separate article in Wikipedia on that topic, that might be a good thing. Kimballp (talk) 15:13, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Qualifications-Based Selection. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]