Talk:Quadriga

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Quadriga is a term also used to refer to the four senses of biblical interpretation (literal, allegorical, chopological and anagogical) as used by mediaeval writers including Aquinas. (86.1.199.200 16:54, 11 April 2007 (UTC)).[reply]

Apollo?

First paragraph:

In classical mythology, quadrigas were the vehicles of the gods; Apollo was often depicted driving his quadriga across the heavens, bringing daylight with him and dispersing the darkness of night.

I'm no scholar of classic greco-roman lit, but wasn't in Helios that guided the sun-quadriga across the sky? This talk page is pretty barren, and I could probably just make the change, but I would like some confirmation from someone more knowledgable than I.

Joe in Seattle 140.160.66.83 22:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, probably not literally in classical mythology, where Apollo and Helios are still separate...but in later Greek, and especially Roman, mythology, they are conflated into one deity. Adam Bishop 22:23, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe. But Helios as the driver of the sun chariot is still a distinct entity, and this ought to be clarified. I think, though I'm not at all sure, that the chariot of Hades (in which Persephone was abducted) is also depicted as drawn by a team of four. Cynwolfe (talk) 17:17, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quadriga

There is no link no disambig, no mention at all of the company called Quadriga.85.227.226.235 (talk) 14:18, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is a quadriga on top of the Politeama Theater in Palermo, Sicily that could be on this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mwtmtmtl (talk • contribs) 08:07, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Restored to Original State?

Has the Brandenburg Quadriga really been restored to its original state? The photo shows an iron cross where the original olive wreath use to be. Is this an older photo, or has the Quadriga only been restored to its iron cross incarnation? (i.e. NOT original state) Tmangray (talk) 18:27, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see that the photo is dated 2006, therefore I edited the text accordingly. Tmangray (talk) 21:01, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are these all quadrigas?

The definition requires 4 horses to draw the chariot. Yet is appears that some of these "quadrigas" are 2-horsed chariots accompanied by 2 additional horses on each site. Ekem (talk) 00:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yes , those statues are quadrigas.LuigiPortaro29 (talk) 17:27, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there also are two 3 horse quadrics in here. Carptrash (talk) 17:39, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

citation needed

"All modern quadrigas are based on the Triumphal Quadriga, a Roman or Greek sculpture which is the only surviving ancient quadriga."

What does this sentence mean? There's no citation. It can't possibly mean that this is the only surviving depiction of a four-horse chariot from antiquity, because that's demonstrably untrue (coins, vase paintings, mosaics). The only sculptural depiction? I'm thinking that would have to exclude reliefs. I'm also unclear what 'all modern quadrigas are based on' means. Does it mean 'our conception of what the ancient quadriga looked like' or 'our knowledge of how an ancient quadriga was constructed' or something else? Cynwolfe (talk) 17:15, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Quadriga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:10, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Italics everywhere is unnecessary

The name of something that originated in a non-English language (Latin, in this case), that has become part of English, is not generally italicized. Do not italicize the title, nor every instance of the words quadriga, quadrigas, and quadrigae. There was recently a discussion about italicized titles at Wikipedia talk:Article titles § Italic title or not?. There are many words taken directly from Latin into English that are used every day, and are not italicized in writing, including consensus, bona fide, and caveat. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 03:16, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed - this has become a word in English. Johnbod (talk) 17:26, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Quadriga Example

Suggest adding in the quadriga found in NYC. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Soldiers%27_and_Sailors%27_Arch G H Smith (talk) 21:22, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]