Talk:Quackerjack

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation

Disney

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character

Television

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision

Untitled

I noticed Quackerjack's origin Story is very similar to B:TAS verison of Riddler as well, though I'm not certain if chronologically that Riddler could've been another influence on this character.

No, neither does any of the othe speculations. He is just a clown type of villain like the Joker, the Trickster, Punch & Jewelee, the Harlequine, the Prankster or the Clown (flash) that uses toys like them or the Toyman.--T-man, the wise 20:43, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"He was once a toymaker who was run out of business after the video game market expanded, but more because his toys were so lethal no one in their right mind would buy them."

Okay, unless I'm mistaken, there was no evidence in the series that his toys were dangerous before he went out of business. Should this be changed? 70.245.178.89 16:19, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! - Tad Stones Interview

I had read the interview in question and Tad Stones never said Quackerjack was his least favorite character - only that he was "disappointed" in the way he turned out. I've changed the article's wording slightly to reflect this.

I meant to say this in the summary of my latest edit, but somehow wound up saving the changes before I could. Sorry!

66.64.233.238 (talk) 04:24, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]