Talk:Qianzhousaurus

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Phylogenetic position of Aliorami

The phylogenetic analysis given in the supplement is not congruent with that of the paper, in the later, Aliorami is a sister taxon to "tyrannosaurinae", more derived than albertosaurinae. What to do? Mike.BRZ (talk) 03:19, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Size inconsistency

From "Description": "Qianzhousaurus was a medium-sized tyrannosaurid estimated to have been 6.3 m (21 ft) long and 757 kg (1,669 lb) in weight.[2][6]"

The size comparison chart depicts Qianzhousaurus as at least 7 m long. The latter is based on PLASTOSPLEEN'S skeletal, which does not cite a reference for this length. --2601:206:8001:A0D0:0:0:0:C414 (talk) 18:27, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nanxiong Formation

The Nanxiong Formation concerns two different sites: the Nanxiong Formation proper, in eastern Guangdong Province, southwest of Nanxiong City, and the "Ganzhou Nanxiong Formation", in southern Jiangxi Province, around Ganzhou City. I wonder if the part of the article devoted to the "paleoenvironment" is not confusing these two sites, which are about 100 km apart. Amaot (talk) 10:10, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]