Talk:Qal'at al-Bahrain/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Tomcat7 (talk · contribs) 11:51, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- "where the Gods met" - the underlined should be in lowercase
- "excavations have been carried out since 1954. The first excavation at the site was carried out by a Danish expedition" - duplicated, does not read well. Suggest remove "and excavations have been carried out since 1954." as redundant
- Units should be converted so that the US readers will understand
- You linked "tell" the second time
- Either spaced n-dashes or unspaced m-dashes.
- " over an area 180000 sqft" - several issues here. First, put a comma in the centre of the number. Sqft should be converted to US unit, and the phrase is not correct. Something like "over an 180,000 sqft area" would be better
- The sentence "The strata spread over an area 180000 sqft, laid out over the 300×600m tell, testifies to continuous human presence from about 2300 BC to the 16th century AD." needs to be reworded completely
- "The site was the capital of the Dilmun, one of the most important ancient civilizations of the region" - you already linked Dilmun, and already stated what they were
- "sarcophagus" - if only one, then add "a"
- " revealed "snake bowls", sarcophagus and a mirror, and many others" - the underlined is unclear. Perhaps write "among other things" (sounds better, imho)
- "with clay and or mortar as binding material. " - decide between "and" or "or"
- "The houses had with plastered floors and were spacious." - not sure what this means
- " The village had well laid out streets.[11]" - odd sentence. Can you reword it to a simple active sentence?
- Why you suddenly introduce hectar, foot?
- " and the walls were built with varying thickness with stone masonry with gates to allow for donkey carrying loads to pass through." - three times with, plus weak wording
- Several odd wordings in "Layout". For example: "where after it was deserted" - do you mean "after when it was deserted"?
- " copper pieces, a socketed spearhead, fishing tools" - suggest "copper pieces, fishing tools and a socketed spearhead"
- "small and large crucibles used for melting of the metal were recovered" - begins with a lowercase "small"
- The article should be really copyedited. The upper sections are Ok, but the prose quality becomes worse and worse. --Tomcat (7) 12:18, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
- Will get to work on these soon, thanks! --Droodkin (talk) 12:39, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
- Okay, I've done most, if not all, of the stuff mentioned above. I'm sorry I didn't find them earlier. It should be fine now, though a copy-edit is needed (alas, I don't have free time :( )--Droodkin (talk) 13:12, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
- I made some changes. Now I think it meets the criteria. Regards.--Tomcat (7) 12:40, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
- Okay, I've done most, if not all, of the stuff mentioned above. I'm sorry I didn't find them earlier. It should be fine now, though a copy-edit is needed (alas, I don't have free time :( )--Droodkin (talk) 13:12, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
- Will get to work on these soon, thanks! --Droodkin (talk) 12:39, 30 November 2012 (UTC)