Talk:Q46 (New York City bus)

Q46 (New York City bus) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 26, 2018. (Reviewed version).

New York City: Public Transportation Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation (assessed as Low-importance).

Buses: New York Low‑importance

	Buses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation (assessed as Low-importance).

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Q46 RDT.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 0 external links on Q46 (New York City bus). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.example.com/map.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:23, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Q46 (New York City bus)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Courcelles (talk · contribs) 01:37, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"and in the peak-direction during the PM rush hour." Which is...?

Done

Q46 locals terminate at Springfield Boulevard, while limiteds alternate between Glen Oaks of LIJ." Or LIJ

Done

"eastbound Q46 locals terminate in Glen Oaks, while eastbound Q46 limiteds terminated at LIJ" They used to? Or still do? Whole section could use a copyedit.

Done–Section copyedited.

"North Shore Bus was taken over by the Board of Transportation because of its bankruptcy" Its is ambigious in a sentence with two antecedents.

Done

From the infobox, "Daily ridership 6,594,164 (2014)[2]" Um... no.

Done That was an issue on all the NYC bus pages. Thanks for finding it. Noone else found that one.

"before ost other streets" Copyedit here, too.

Done

"Limited-stop service began on April 18, 1977 with the perception that it would attract new riders to the route." Perception is likely not the word you want here.

Done

"Along with the M15, the two routes became the first to use limited service in the city." Source?

Done

"peak-direction during the PM rush hour." Again, don't make us guess which is "peak"

Done

"The express Q44As were also intended to compete with privately owned expresses buses operated by Queens Surface–travel times were 20 minutes shorter and the fare was $5 less" What? Just how expensive were those private buses? 5 bucks was a ton of money back then...
- This was stated in the MTA's Annual Report for 1977.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 00:10, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"which made the first city route" Which made it the...

Done

"{{cite web|title=Service to Glen Oaks operates weekdays only}}" Kill the cite template, it throws red errors.
- I haven't seen any red errors.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 00:09, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Don't use all-caps in references just because you're copy and pasting. See refs 5, 10, 12, 14, 17, and 30.

Done

No bare URL's as citations, ref 25

Done

Ref 20 needs a better citation

Which reference are you referring to?--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 00:27, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ref 20. Needs publisher, ISBN, proof of reliability, not just a point to a useless Google Books page with no info. Courcelles (talk) 00:33, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't useless. By typing in phrases, I got several pages worth of information.

--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 00:51, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/005778122 It is from the ASCE which is credible, and this is cited by the US DOT. https://archive.org/stream/transportations8249urbi_0#page/n1/mode/2up

--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 01:06, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Courcelles: Why haven't you responded? --Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 15:17, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As explained on my talk page (and just putting here for the record) I was inpatient in a hospital for most of the delay, for which I apologize. Courcelles (talk) 18:40, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, passing. Courcelles (talk) 18:40, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]