Talk:Pythium porphyrae
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pythium porphyrae article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Pythium porphyrae be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
AfC
[edit]This article looks good overall and would be a net positive. As I know very little about species, I'd ping @Zefr: and @UtherSRG: who are members of the Wikiproject specie group and seem to be active recently. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 14:55, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/24 November 2017
- Accepted AfC submissions
- C-Class Fungi articles
- Low-importance Fungi articles
- Wikipedia requested images of fungi
- WikiProject Fungi articles
- C-Class Protista articles
- Low-importance Protista articles
- Wikipedia requested images of protists
- WikiProject Protista articles
- Wikipedia requested images of biota