Jump to content

Talk:Pyromania/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Reassessment

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch


Final GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):Does not go into depth b (MoS (Med)): does not follow WP:LEAD
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): insufficient references
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): No
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: Yes
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.: Yes
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:07, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]