Talk:Putting-out system

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Mid‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 January 2021 and 7 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Paigegunnett.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion

I have looked at the comments in which someone else proposed merges. There are lots of assertions that they are different, but no further detail. Please sign in, agree or disagree, provide detail why, and then sign your comment (4 tildas) Ehusman 03:27, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg

Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:33, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

esta es una historia muy interesante deberian de escribir mas sobre ello porque asi aprendemos mas —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.250.190.123 (talk) 14:32, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A cottage industry is an industry

Wikipedians must get over this mind-numbing practice of defining a word or term by referring to itself. Nickrz (talk) 17:41, 9 March 2011 (UTC) An industry certainly does not include bloggers talking about a specific manufacturer.Splodgeness (talk) 10:12, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough information

It doesn't tell the reader why the domestic system ended — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.24.238.214 (talk) 12:26, 22 December 2013 (UTC) Maybe because it hasn't!! I worked for 30 years producing control systems from my house, and this is not unusual. Splodgeness (talk) 10:13, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

also not enough information on what the different types of cottage industries were in pre-industrial times 173.222.1.166 (talk) 01:25, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Nakabayashi's comment on this article

Dr. Nakabayashi has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:

The article is not inaccurate, but fails to show that putting-out was widely seen beyond the Western world, particular in weaving. For instance, putting-out was a typical work organization of hand weaving in Japan from the early modern times to the 1900s, until factories equipped with power looms became predominant.

We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.

Dr. Nakabayashi has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:

Reference : NAKABAYASHI, Masaki, 2013. "Honesty, Diligence, and Skill: Risk Sharing and Specialization in the Kiryu Silk Weaving Cluster, Japan," ISS Discussion Paper Series (series F) f166, Institute of Social Science, The University of Tokyo, revised 03 Jun 2014.

ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 12:59, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contemporary World - Difference to Freelancing??

I added a link to freelancing and subcontracting, but i am genuinely not very clear on what the difference is, if there is one. Is this just an old term? I mean reading

The merchant would "put-out" basic materials to the cottage workers, who then prepared the materials in their own homes and returned the finished merchandise back to the merchant.

i know several people who are freelancing, who work exactly like that. I know other people who work exactly like that, but they are not even freelancing, they are fixed employees. this article would benefit from someone knowledgeable in the historical subject giving some context as to where our current gig economy // freelance // work-at-home // etc world differs from this. was there a swing away from this during the IR and we are now swinging back? thank you.--91.64.37.246 (talk) 22:47, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Putting-out is now pretty unusual in First World manufacturing, I would have thought. But what do I know. What, if anything, are they making? Historically they would have nearly all been self-employed, I would have thought. Johnbod (talk) 01:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]