Talk:Pushkar Lake

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pushkar Lake article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Pushkar Lake has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 22, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 15, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Hindu pilgrims to Pushkar Lake in Rajasthan, India, considered it lucky to be devoured by the crocodiles there?

India: Rajasthan / Geography Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rajasthan (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

Hinduism Mid‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lakes Mid‑importance

	Lakes portal Pushkar Lake is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WP:INDIA Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 08:27, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pushkar Lake/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: WTF? (talk) 16:04, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article is mostly complete with respect to meeting the requirements of GA. Still needed a decent copyedit to clean up some minor areas of poor grammar (mostly done). The article could also use a minor reorganization to make it more focused. Below is how it measures up against the six good article criteria:

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
Done After copyedit, I think the article mostly meets this criteria. Please see the remaining 'dubious' tag regarding a run-on sentence that I wasn't sure how to reorganize.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Done Please see the 'citation needed' tag regarding the population figure for Pushkar city.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Covers most of the major aspects that I would expect it to discuss. I would recommend reorganizing some of the sections to make it more focused and easier to read. First, move the hydrology (climate) section into the geography section, since these are all related. I'd put the flora & fauna section immediately after geography, since that is also somewhat related (though keep it as its own section -- readers should be able to jump conveniently from a description of geography into a description of the wildlife surrounding the lake). History, religious significance, and cultural attractions are also somewhat related, so after flora & fauna, I would put those three sections. A general description of the history should come first, followed by religion, and then culture. The status & conservation section can come last.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
The article appears to be written in a neutral tone, conforming to WP:NPOV requirements.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
The article appears to be stable; no major edit-warring or WP:3RR violations.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Most images are tagged and captioned appropriately. There are a few issues. First, File:Pushkar Lake.jpg (infobox) is tagged under the GFDL but has no description or source information. There's also a category warning box in the image's description as well. Secondly, sections should not begin with an image -- the panoramic image under 'Status and conservation issues' should be moved to the bottom of the section.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Once the above issues are resolved, the article can be listed at WP:GA. I will leave it on hold until March 7, 2010, so that the issues may be resolved. WTF? (talk) 16:04, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the precise review. Even before I could read your message on my Talk page and attend to issues raised, User:Mephiston999 had already carried out the needed changes. I hope they meet your acceptance. I have made some minor edits only but changed the img in the infobox with another image to which no issues are tagged. I have shifted the Climate subsection before 'Hydrology' as it forms the input for Hydrology studies. I have also changed a repeat word. I hope with these changes the article would meet GA acceptance from you. If therre are any more issues, I will be happy to addres them. I must mention that your review is also knowledge enhancement to me on many aspects. Thanks once again.--Nvvchar (talk) 09:08, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick fixes! The article now meets all six good article criteria and can be listed at WP:GA. Also, the new infobox image is much better than the other one -- very nice shot! Almost makes me want to visit! Cheers! WTF? (talk) 15:10, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Pushkar Lake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.pushkarfair.org/pushkar-facts/ecology-of-pushkar-valley.html
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.nih.ernet.in/nih_rbis/india_information/lakes.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:32, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Pushkar Lake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090330055547/http://www.ibtimes.com:80/contents/20090327/ten-worlds-most-religious-cities.htm to http://www.ibtimes.com/contents/20090327/ten-worlds-most-religious-cities.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:54, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Pushkar Lake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:38, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]