Talk:Pugachev's Rebellion

Russia: History / Military High‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

Military history: Russian & Soviet / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Merge proposal

Yemelyan Pugachev is notable only in the context of Pugachev's Rebellion. Now the content is uselessly split between the two. E.g., section "pugachev's legacy" certainly belongs to The Rebellion article. `'mikka (t) 22:35, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All the info was originally in the Pugachev article, I moved most of it as you said to Rebellion. I don't really care if its merged. David Fuchs 00:10, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support the merge, although we have separate articles for Kondraty Bulavin and Astrakhan Rebellion. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 17:42, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I humbly oppose merging. I think that there can be a wider discussion of the rebellion, without details of the life and personality of Pugachev, in an article of the rebellion. By the same token, an article of the life of this person needn't contain details of the rebellion. Just my unbiased and humble opinion. Thank you. Piercetp 22:30, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

this article is full of basic errors (such as claiming that Bibikov was killed by Pugachev) - as well as containing a host of un-sourced and historically dubious generalizations. I would be inclined to merge it and frankly excise most of this very amateurish content. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prinkipo71 (talk • contribs)

Wow. Since the last time I editing a lot of crap was thrown in. I would support merge. David Fuchs^(talk) 00:43, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Pugachev's Rebellion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:03, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]