Talk:Public relations of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Public relations of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Latter Day Saint movement Mid‑importance

	Latter Day Saint movement portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article design

I started an introduction using the materila that you have. I didn't remove any material. Also I added a few section titles. I did not add any content. Please feel free to change this as you see fit. I am just suggesting a format. It is not set in stone. Good article. Thanks. Steve Quinn (formerly Ti-30X) (talk) 06:05, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it was initially just a transplant from the History of The Church of Jesus Crhsit of Latter-day Saints article under this heading. I added in some more stuff largely from Dr. Cowan's book, but also using some other sources. There is a lot more work to do, especially at the end. Thankyou for the help. We do need more content in some places, and more sources would help.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:40, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why in the world does this article exist?

This should be at most a paragraph in the main LDS church article - this topic is WAY too obscure to have such a huge treatment in my humble opinion. Most of the content is unsourced and POV (and I suspect unsourceable).--Descartes1979 (talk) 19:37, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]