This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Hi BD, I only just noticed special:diff/750779518 sorry it got lost in distraction to later replies. I think I'll take you up on that in response to your special:diff/752651460.
That said, I don't necessarily agree that there is a clear consensus to close the discussion or not add the names. You and I agree for their inclusion, after all, and it looked like neither Hidden Tempo or Ravensfire were pushing for their exclusion. Jayron32 and RHAworth and TFD also seemed neutral on this, arguing for evidence and proper argument procedure, but not exclusion.
The objections I did see from MelanieN and Michelangelo1992 and Muboshgu and MrX and NorthBySouthBaranof and Scjessey for the most part did not focus on whether or not the nick names were notable. I think you rushed to calling that a 'clear consensus'.
Consensus can only be achieved through conversation, so only those editors who demonstrably weighed the evidence presented in the source (by discussing it directly) can be said to have engaged in the process. The only 'votes' we should be counting in a tally (even though that's not how consensus works) are that of clearly engaged persons, not people showing up to voice a protest to inclusion of information on the basis of offensiveness rather than notability.
Actually, I do not agree for their inclusion in the main article. I think that we should have a separate article on this topic, which is why I created this one (it was removed from mainspace after a discussion of the matter, but I believe that this consensus will change in the future, as we get further from the protectionism associated with the campaign. bd2412T15:00, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]