Talk:Psychochemical warfare

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Review

I think that this article is close to a B class. It only needs a couple more citations (where I've tagged) and I think it will be a B class. Once these are done, if you want another assessment, please go to WP:MHA and place the article name in the list and someone will review it again. Cheers. AustralianRupert (talk) 04:31, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion ideas

Have these every been used in combat? Are they legal under international law? -- Beland (talk) 23:13, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't personally know if they've been used, but they'd be illegal as they are chemical weapons. 96.55.192.119 (talk) 15:50, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fringe element

FYI, I have posted a query on this article at WP:FTN. Some of the content seems unrelated to the "psychochemical" aspect, and some of the sourcing seems inappropriate. Alexbrn ^{talk|contribs|COI} 12:58, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know about fringe, but from a quick read of the article, I agree with alexbrn that sourcing and focus of the article could be a bit better. It very much seems like an article that has a place in WP. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 17:35, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

From the sources I've examined, they are typically either being misused to support a POV or sidetrack into off-topic OR. The section on Cold War seems to be a WP:POVFORK of MK Ultra, but I can't confirm since the sources are largely inaccessible. - LuckyLouie (talk) 18:21, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]