Talk:Provinces of Argentina

Argentina High‑importance

	Argentina portal This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentine Geography. If you would like to participate, you can improve Provinces of Argentina, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

User:Golbez decided and executed moves of provinces that used "X Province, Argentina" to "X Province (Argentina)". Now there are two different forms of geographical disambig, one with comma, one with parenthesis. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 21:39, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

You are somehow right, yet there was something of a consensus about it. Sadly, I had enough about this subject and don't feel like loosing more time with the naming of the articles instead of working on the articles themselves. Mariano(t/c) 11:14, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tierra del Fuego Province

I've filed a requested move of the article Tierra del Fuego, Antarctica, and South Atlantic Islands Province and thought people here might be interested in taking part. Thanks. Pfainuk talk 10:37, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Official Languages of Chubut

Does the Welsh language really hold "official" status in the province of Chubut? If so, we need to cite some official government source to confirm this. Although the Welsh language is certainly spoken in Chubut within the Welsh-Argentine community, that language would need to be recognized under provincial government legislation in order to be listed as an "official language" of the province. Crm18 (talk) 18:09, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it. Windroff (talk) 22:52, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Argentine provinces by GDP (PPP) per capita

GDP has increased at least 25%. somebody should change the data.178.59.206.214 (talk) 15:53, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

where is the gdp list???

This article had a nice gdp ppp list, where is it now?176.92.144.222 (talk) 17:39, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There's one here List of Argentine provinces by gross domestic product. Very old numbers though, they need to be updated. SegataSanshiro1 (talk) 08:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Buenos Aires Status

I suggest to remove the phrase "Distrito Federal" (Federal District) from the name of Buenos Aires autonomous city in the list of provinces. The reason is that the city of Buenos Aires is not a federal district (that is, a part of the country that is administered by the Federal government) but rather an autonomous city which is self-administered. The term "Capital Federal" (Federal Capital) is anachronistic but still accurate and usable, as the city of Buenos Aires is the capital of the federal republic and the seat of the federal government. That said, and although common, it is not advisable to use "Capital Federal" as it is only a description of a legal status and is subject to change. (Let's say, if the capital moves to another city, that city will become "Capital Federal", but Buenos Aires city will still be the autonomous city of Buenos Aires unless it's constitution is revoked, which is way more unlikely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.254.7.172 (talk) 18:31, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Codes of the provinces

Don't we need ISO_3166-2:AR codes instead of (or alongside) HASC in the list? --Jonah ☎ 20:20, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1990 or 1991

In Governor of Tierra del Fuego it says that Tierra del Fuego became a province in 1991, but here it says 1990. --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 09:17, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

POV Map

The map in the infobox on this article takes a strong POV supporting the Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, and a segment of Antarctica. Unlike in other articles (e.g. Federal subjects of Russia), this is not treated as open to debate or dispute, but rather that these territories are indisputably part of Argentina. This is POV.

Note that in the case of Federal subjects of Russia, Russia actually has some control over the claimed federal subjects in Ukraine. Argentina has no control over the Falklands or South Georgia or the South Sandwich Islands, and minimal control over Antarctica.

But in cases where the country claims territory it does not control, by far the most common method is just to ignore the claimed territory. Prefectures of Japan does not include the Kuril Islands at all. The map in Regions of Morocco stops at the internationally-recognised border, excluding Western Sahara entirely, even though Morocco controls most of Western Sahara and includes Western Sahara in its regional structure. The map in Departments of Guatemala completely ignores Guatemala's claims in Belize. The map in States of Venezuela completely ignores the fact that Venezuela claims most of Guyana. This article does the opposite.

The current map is POV and per WP:NPOV must be removed or replaced with a neutral map. Kahastok talk 09:38, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"this is not treated as open to debate or dispute, but rather that these territories are indisputably part of Argentina"

This simply isn't true, but I've added a caption to clarify this. That should fix the issue. Note that this is also mentioned in the article itself, at the end of the History section.

Regarding the rest of your post- there are two problems with this "method" you describe. First, just to be clear- you are not quoting official wikipedia policies. Not even guidelines. You are simply presenting your opinion. Other editors are therefore not obligated to obey if they're not convinced. Second, this method is not in use in the equivalent articles of the other two countries that claim the same territories Argentina claims: Provinces of Chile and Administrative geography of the United Kingdom. Both articles do the same thing this article does- they show territorial claims in a map and explain that they are just that- claims. Both articles have been up for years and no one has had an issue with them. By suppressing maps that show Argentina's claims and leaving the British and Chilean maps with their claims intact, Wikipedia would be taking sides in the dispute, which would be a violation of WP:NPOV. EDIT Esequibo is not a good example. Until very recently, Venezuela did not consider the disputed territory to be part of any specific Venezuelan state. This changed in 2023. The map is from 2007. EDIT 2 Belize isn't a good example either. Guatemala doesn't consider the disputed territory to be part of any specific Guatemalan department. Bob meade (talk) 21:18, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]