Talk:Proud Prophet
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Proud Prophet be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): LandonSherwood, Josh.Brown0790, ChisumStuckey, Slangley111.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:48, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lbenne, GravityActually.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:48, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Almost entire article based on Bracken's analysis of it?
[edit]I'm wondering if that makes the article qualified for the single source template. I'm particularly concerned that Bracken makes a number of bold statements about the wargame's outcome but the outcomes and the timeline of the scenario listed in the report has not been declassified. I'm doubtful Bracken would still be a free man if he had used classified information to write his book which make me suspect his statements are bogus. 118.211.44.190 (talk) 04:04, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
- I've been reading through the article and I agree with this three year old take on the matter. Some very bold statements are made despite the fact the exercise is still very classified. I'd like to clean it up myself but that's a pretty serious endeavour. Kylesenior (talk) 13:03, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- A new, pointed perspective may be offered (to remedy the concerns mentioned immediately above) via an article published today in the New York Times, written by William Langewiesche. For example, the subtitle summarizes Proud Prophet's impact more concisely: "The devastating outcome of the 1983 game reveals that nuclear escalation inevitably spirals out of control." https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/02/magazine/nuclear-strategy-proud-prophet.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.17.243.105 (talk) 01:40, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Cold War Science
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2022 and 6 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Joejojie (article contribs).
- C-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/18 May 2016
- Accepted AfC submissions
- C-Class Cold War articles
- High-importance Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- Start-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- Start-Class Cold War articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Wikipedia requested images