Talk:Protein tertiary structure

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as High-importance).

Untitled

I'd really like to see a good citation for the assertion about de novo tertiary structure prediction being feasable as of 2007 - it's been about 18 months since I properly studied this, but the tutors I had then were pretty dubious of it.

Once I've dug out some notes/refs I'll probably expand this a bit - certainly could do with a brief mention of circular oligopeptide structure prediction, which is pretty well establised, IIRC. Spidrak 18:40, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Massive reorganization of biomolecular structure articles

This article was moved from Tertiary structure as a result of a proposal at WT:MCB. Tertiary structure now redirects to Biomolecular structure instead. Antony-22 (talk) 20:32, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit

Hi, I've finished copy editing this article. Let me know if you would like more work done on it. Regards, Myrtle. Myrtlegroggins (talk) 08:02, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem

I've been looking at this article as part of a contributor copyright investigation. A user copied two sentences directly from http://www.elmhurst.edu/~chm/vchembook/567tertprotein.html, one of them is more or less still there ("The tertiary structure is determined by a variety of bonding interactions between amino acid side chains"). Is there another way to word this accurately without using the source's exact wording? Alternatively if I took this sentence out would the text that follows it still make sense? January (talk) 22:25, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi January, sure there is. "Amino acid side chains may interact and bond in a number of ways. The interactions and bonds of side chains within a particular protein determine its tertiary structure." Regards, Myrtle. Myrtlegroggins (talk) 22:35, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect, thank you! January (talk) 09:36, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Protein tertiary structure/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

There is no mention of protein domains within the article. I'm no expert, but I believe they are important when learning about tertiary protein structure. Leaving domains completely out of this article is like leaving out nucleosomes when talking about chromatin; or like leaving out cells when talking about tissues.

Last edited at 01:56, 1 January 2012 (UTC). Substituted at 03:29, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Protein tertiary structure. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:32, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Secondary structures are NOT domains!

Domains belong in the realm of tertiary structures. Alpha helices and beta strands are secondary structure elements. Even a beta sheet (a parallel or antiparallel arrangement of beta-strands) is not a tertiary structure, it is a super-secondary structure element. I will not change it btw in order to not get punished for "vandalism". I suggest the original author or a moderator take care of that.

--Felix Tritschler (talk) 13:47, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]