Talk:Protein kinase C zeta type

Neuroscience Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: MCB

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Not plaigarism

For future reference, I just wanted to note here that there are a couple phrases in this article that were written by Tsacktor (talk · contribs), who is also the author of [1]. So in case anyone ever suspects it, it's not actually plaigarism. Cheers, David Iberri (talk) 20:21, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sufficient

Thus PKMζ is both necessary and sufficient for maintaining LTP.

I don't follow how the preceding text demonstrates sufficiency. Surely there are other chemicals there that have not yet been knocked out. MaxEnt (talk) 15:21, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Infusing PKMz into postsynaptic cells produces the same changes that underlie the maintenance phase of late LTP. My understanding is that if PKMz is applied, no upstream molecules appear to be needed (eg, CaMKII, PKA, etc.), which demonstrates sufficiency. --David Iberri (talk) 00:09, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]