Talk:Protect Indian Family

Gokulpr 07:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC) Reposting the information about Protect Indian Family, since http://protectindianfamily.org/ does not claim any copy rights as mentioned at the bottom of their main page "Protect Indian Family do not claim any Copyright on any Articles." Gokulpr 07:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I note the above. However the article as created was so far from Wikipedia standards that it might as well be deleted. When you have re-written it in proper Wikipedia style it will not be a copyvio anyway. -- RHaworth 08:25, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ok , rewritten and posted again. Hope its ok now.

Gokulpr 12:17, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This page continues to be nothing more than the most transparent of self-promotional pages, written the second time by the guy who wrote it the first, still posting numbers, and prolific self-serving links. I've changed the page to a redirect to the proper organization. ThuranX 12:40, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If not to give information on the 'subject', why should wikipedia have articles about anything!, I dont understand why my posts are getting deleted. Reposting with no numbers.

Gokulpr 06:50, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Look. You're only posting on this page, and your only purpose is to promote your own business. it needs to stop. the page should be a redirect to the SIF page. This was the major alternative to deletion in the last AfD. As you have seen fit to recreate the pages with identical 'information', I've seen fit to follow that AfD suggestion for a redirect. Since you've seen fit to revert this, I caution you, re-esstablishing the page with nearly identical information can easily lead to a second AfD. Further, to answer your repeated question, Wikipedia is NOT an advertising resource, it is an encyclopedia. That means it collects and grows with the addition of USEFUL information. Wikipedia does NOT want advertisements, which your page is. It's your group's pamphlet, not an NPOV article about the organization. ThuranX 13:49, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]