Talk:Prostitution in Singapore

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Prostitution in Singapore article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Singapore Low‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality: Sex work Mid‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sex work task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External link

I'm not sure why my external link is not allowed here (geylangredlightdistrict.com) - this is a far less "spammy" site than your #1 external ("Singapore Sex Guide"). At least my site contains valuable insights into the red light culture of Singapore, and adds value to your links collection.

What is your criteria for banning me? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.103.91.101 (talk) 06:24, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Link Use

Xinjiapo: There are a couple of problems with your direct link to the page from your/someone's blog with a video on it: 1) You should not link directly from the text to an external site, instead you should link it in as a reference, 2) The sentence you use is "A popular video at http://singapore.welcumed.com brings you to an online tour to red light districts and prostitution in Singapore". It's just not an objective fact that this video is "popular", and the use of a URL in-line in the text is not the way we do it on Wikipedia. 3) The blog you're linking to is a commercial operator, selling a product. While this does not disqualify linking to it, it certainly means you need to have a really good reason for doing so. There's already a link to the blog in the External Links-section, so another link to a specific blog entry is not really called for. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Uspn (talk • contribs) 16:08, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign prostitutes in Singapore

http://www.viet-studies.info/kinhte/Viet_Women_in_Singapore.htm

http://sglinks.com/pages/1831389-vietnamese-prostitutes-openly-prowl-chinatown

http://web.archive.org/web/20111030004816/http://sg.news.yahoo.com/vietnamese-prostitutes-openly-prowl-chinatown.html

http://www.businessnavigator.net/vietnamese-prostitutes-openly-prowl-chinatown-in-singapore.html

Rajmaan (talk) 17:25, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Prostitution in Singapore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041118093330/http://www.yawningbread.org/arch_2004/yax-383.htm to http://www.yawningbread.org/arch_2004/yax-383.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:54, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]