Talk:Prosperity Bancshares

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Houston (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Houston, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.HoustonWikipedia:WikiProject HoustonTemplate:WikiProject HoustonHouston articles

Not a candidate for speedy deletion

This article does NOT meet the criteria because:

I am in the process of adding additional content
The information was taken from a public document (a Form 10-K), not company advertising.

Quidam65 (talk) 16:21, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you're adding additional content, you may want to focus on reliable sources, which are entirely absent in what I see (a company's own press releases and other self-published material do not qualify). There is also the problem of notability; it seems to be implicitly inferred by what you're saying here, but it needs to be explicit. What arm's-length third-party expert sources think this company is notable, and where can we read that opinion? Accounting4Taste:talk 16:33, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I realize my mistake. Some info here Racconish^Tk 06:08, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]