Talk:Prosopon

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Theology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Theology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TheologyWikipedia:WikiProject TheologyTemplate:WikiProject TheologyTheology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WP:NPOV

The article is disproportionate to two heretics like Theodore of Mopsuestia and his disciple Nestorius that are wrongly presented as "Antiochene Christologists". Their allocutions are not so encyclopedically relevant to understand the true theological meaning of the Greek word Prosopon.

The WP article needs to be corroborated with a more solid description of the history of the notion in the Christian Patristics as well as in the Ecumenical Councils. The current article gives a minimum concern for both of them.Philosopher81sp (talk) 20:37, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Self-Link? Remove or Create New Article?

The word dyoprosopic near the end of the article links back to the same article.

Either that link should be removed or a new article expounding that term should be created.

1.146.187.2 (talk) 20:34, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

-physitism vs -prosopic?

Is there a meaningful difference between the two? Such as monophysitic vs monoprosopic- those seem to refer to the same concept.

These two sources seem to refer to the same concept with the differing words, but I'm not certain. If the terms do in fact refer to the same concept, this should be mentioned in both articles (Christology seems the primary one for -physitism, with various -physitism articles and Prosopon for -prosopic), and the theories in this article can be linked to their -physitism counterparts.

https://slife.org/christology/ https://www.biblestandard.com/uploads/2/1/4/9/21496142/e13_-_samuels-kings-chronicles_[web].pdf

TypistMonkey (talk) 15:01, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Unio personalis" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Unio personalis has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 10 § Unio personalis until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 15:11, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Lots of the sources don't seem to be used in the article itself. There seems to be only 6 bibliographic references used in the article, the rest are just sitting, eh unused which is odd looking. scope_creep^Talk 09:02, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]