Talk:Propheteering

This article is crap —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.114.147.215 (talk) 22:34, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Failed AFD

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Propheteering. Johnleemk | Talk 16:33, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

I did some major cleanup on the article. Most of it was just tidying up the English and making things flow better. --Woohookitty^{(cat scratches)} 09:52, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I also pared down the links list. Ben, if you want to claim that these are "references" then point out where what was said in the article was referenced from. I just see a bunch of articles accusing others of propheteering, which is fine, but we don't need so many of them. --Woohookitty^{(cat scratches)} 10:01, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't like the use of the phrase, "someone who can read tarot cards might well be real". This is poor wording because the language is too definite. There's no proof that any tarot card reader is real, and even if they were I wouldn't call them a prophet. --Bwfrazier08 (talk) 05:57, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2007-02-8 Automated pywikipediabot message

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 23:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]