Talk:Propaganda model/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: -- Cirt (talk) 19:46, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
- I will review this article. -- Cirt (talk) 19:46, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Successful good article nomination
[edit]I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of December 21, 2010, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Intro is too short (quick fail).
- 2. Factually accurate?: Major problems, tons of unsourced chunks all over article, entire sects (quick fail).
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Hard to tell, due to major sourcing failures.
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Difficult to assess, due to referencing issues.
- 5. Article stability? No major issues with this.
- 6. Images?: Absence of significant problems here.
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— -- Cirt (talk) 20:02, 21 December 2010 (UTC)