Talk:Project Alberta/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 04:56, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll start this review shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:56, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No DABs, external links good.
Images appropriately licensed.
Shedon or Sheldon Dike? I imagine the latter, but you never know...
- Sheldon Dike. Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hyphenated air conditioned and 155 degree.
- Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
which would want to account for everything when what would be required huh?
- Ramsey overcame the problem of how to ship through the San Francisco Port of Embarkation. The port wanted a detailed list of what was being sent so it could track it to ensure delivery, but what needed to be shipped was still subject to last-minute change. He simply designated everything as a "bomb assembly kit". Hope this is clear enough. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Need something to explain the Gadget.
- the case-less Fat Man bomb used for the Trinity nuclear test Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What were the bomb assemblies? Everything except the uranium/plutonium?
- And the Polonium-Beryllium initiators, yeah. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest using military time format
- Good idea. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Parsons, who as the "weaponeer" was in command of the mission, either properly punctuate this bit by setting off "as the weaponeer" as a dependent clause or move it to the end of the phrase.
- Split the sentence
behind by the aircraft Group Operations Officer delete aircraft
- Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
For security reasons, components that it was decided not to return to the United States were dumped at sea This is awkward.
- For security reasons, components not returned to the United States were dumped at sea Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Put the title of Alvarez into title case.
- Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Your portal bar would look better above the Manhattan Project navbox than below.
- Done, but I don't think so. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:03, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All points addressed. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:08, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I highly recommend watching the YouTube video. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:13, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

- I did, very interesting. The comment about the portal bar was just a suggestion, so feel free to move it back if you'd prefer. Sorry for not making that clearer. Everything looks good to go.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:20, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]