Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request
This page is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a restricted topic. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.)
Administrators may disregard the above message.
You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If administrator}}. You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page:
.ECR-edit-request-warning{display:none;}
Warning: active arbitration remedies
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
All participants in formal discussions (RfCs, RMs, etc) within the area of conflict are urged to keep their comments concise, and are limited to 1,000 words per discussion. Citations and quotations (whether from sources, Wikipedia articles, Wikipedia discussions, or elsewhere) do not count toward the word limit.
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Lacking non-commentary sources with significant coverage, the current version of this article seems to lack strong RS footing. I looked for examples of non-commentary RS with more than passing mention this phrase's existence, but I have not succeeded. Are there sources I am missing, or am I undervaluing those currently in the article? Freelance-frank (talk) 11:54, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The book Except for Palestine given as further reading uses the phrase in quotes without attribution "Against the backdrop of these realities, the American political left has normalized a world in which it is acceptable, through words and policies, to embrace the ethical and political contradiction of being "progressive except for Palestine"".
It is possible that rather than relying on the specific phrase, a title like the Palestine exception or some other descriptive title might work better, I will take a look a bit later when I get some time. Selfstudier (talk) 12:04, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A different and more general article title would probably be more tractable. I think it would be hard to write an article on the current topic without a lot of inferences and OR. Maybe also worth looking for an article to merge this content into. Haven't found a good one yet. Freelance-frank (talk) 12:15, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That book probably isn't a good source for the current version of this article. The Jacobin piece notes: "Discussion of why exactly that is, and the historical roots of 'progressive except for Palestine,' doesn’t feature prominently in the book." I was unable to find more than a passing mention of this topic. Freelance-frank (talk) 13:59, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That could work! It's too bad that there's not a page included in Types of Zionism or Zionism#Types into which this kind of content could be merged as some sort of critique section, or I'd lean towards that instead (perhaps that's a point in the camp of those who endorse the PEP label). Freelance-frank (talk) 19:05, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Selfstudier I didn't imagine that this article would be interpreted as only inclusive of sources that used the exact word-for-word phrase "Progressive except Palestine". Any source discussing leftists being anti-Palestinian despite their leftism would fall under the same concept. There are sources that say "Palestinian exception" or "Progressive minus Palestine" or whatever, but it's all the same idea, and the most common way to describe it seems to be PEP. If this article were to be merged, the clear page for it would be Anti-Palestinianism. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 11:23, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it is necessarily only a Zionist support thing but in any case, we can widen the scope further still if you want ("progessive" is an American thing I think, this word is not usually used in other countries) with something like Palestine and left wing politics? I don't mind, it is just a question of the scope and assuming we have the requisite sourcing for that. Selfstudier (talk) 14:08, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]