This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
That's stupid. The people in question have all been dead for centuries, we hardly know what they believed anyway, and practically the only reason we have heard of them at all is because they were considered heretics by their contemporaries. "Heretic" is, de facto, a neutral historical term for people who were thrown out of mainstream Christian churches for teaching heterodox doctrines. The article is not "declaring" them heretics, it's simply describing a historical fact. Ming the Merciless15:27, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In my experience, the accusation of heresy is an accusation of grave religious error, not of grave religious error from the POV of a mainstream church; furthermore the classification of mainstream and non-mainstream is itself POV; and the argument that since the Montanists no longer exit, therefore they are not mainstream is victor's justice. Jacob Haller12:38, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
