Talk:Priyanka Chopra/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vensatry (talk · contribs) 05:41, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Although the article looks pretty good, it is a long way from the GA status. There are some serious sourcing issues such as reliability of sourced used, WP:V, bare references, etc.,

Prose

WP:LEAD should summarize the whole article. It doesn't talk about her modeling career
"Early life" section is too small and is inadequately sourced
Brian Kennedy - dab
There are a few MOS issues such as usage of italics, TOI, HT and WatchTime needs to be italicised
Nothing more is mentioned about her modeling assignments which forms a vital part of her career, rather most of the article talks about her acting career and Music career.
"Southern superstar" is superfluous
Released dates for her films in the table is not encouraged per MOS
No need to mention "Double role" in the notes column

Unsourced statements

"Chopra also sang playback in the film, singing "Ullathai Killadhe" along with Vijay"
"earning her a Filmfare Best Female Debut Award and a nomination for Filmfare Best Supporting Actress Award"
"She earned a Filmfare Best Villain Award, becoming the second and last female actor to win the award after Kajol (the category has been retired since 2008). She also received a second nomination for Filmfare Best Supporting Actress Award for the role"
The third para of "Initial success and professional setbacks" contains just a single source
"Big Brother, also underperformed at the box-office"
"She has also signed Apoorva Lakhia's Zanjeer opposite southern superstar Ram Charan Teja who is making his Bollywood debut. It is a remake of the Hindi 1973 film of the same name"
The second and third paras of her Music career relies on a single source
"When Chopra won the Miss World crown, she became the fifth Indian woman to win the title, and the fourth Indian woman to win in a span of seven years"

Referencing

"priyankachopra.org" looks like a fan site
Refs #1, #83, #84, #103, #107, #121 and #123 are dead
Refs #7, #12, #20, #22 are rd
Most of the "bollywoodhungama" links appear to be dead
What makes "liveindia.com", "IndiaGlitz" , "filmicafe", "Movie Talkies", "Entertainment.in.msn.com", "Redhotcurry.com" and "Now Running" reliable
Refs #52, #60 are missing publisher/work parameter
Most of the Refs starting from #64 to #78 are incomplete
Inconsistent format in sourcing
Refs #112-#115, #118-#120, #126 use just bare URLS

Check against the GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

This article has a lot of potential of becoming close to GA material in the near future, but certainly not at this satge. Considering the fact that the nominator is inexperienced and not a major contributor atleast to this article, I don't think the issues can very well be handled with in the hold period. Henceforth, I am quick-failing this. I suggest the nominator to consult the regular contributors and go for a peer review before going in for a second nomination. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 05:41, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]