Talk:Principle of good enough
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 9 March 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Comment)
[edit]If anyone cares, doc searls wrote about POGE here:
http://doc.weblogs.com/2003/04/19 - which appears to be a toasty url.
And he was breathing the same air as I was, at the time, and we hung out a lot, virtually...
I don't know how far back the usage of POGE goes, but I'd written about it here:
http://the-edge.blogspot.com/2003/05/principle-of-good-enough-poge-blogger.html
And here:
http://the-edge.blogspot.com/2002_06_09_the-edge_archive.html#77710440
Sure wish I could come up with a good name for the 5x axiom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.47.25.97 (talk) 04:56, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Multiple issues
[edit]The disputed cat is Category:Programming principles. The article is WP:MADEUP of two feeble 2009 links. –89.204.137.42 (talk) 15:55, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Killed the cat—the IP complaint a month ago was by me. –Be..anyone (talk) 05:46, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Stub-Class Systems articles
- Unknown-importance Systems articles
- Unassessed field Systems articles
- WikiProject Systems articles
- Stub-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- Stub-Class software articles
- Unknown-importance software articles
- Stub-Class software articles of Unknown-importance
- All Software articles
- All Computing articles