Jump to content

Talk:Principality of Calenberg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Title move to Principality of Calenberg

[edit]

This will enable disambiguation from about a dozen other meanings including the origin of the name "Calenberg" which is the hill in Germany that was the site of its castle and seat of the House of Hanover. I will then create the Calenberg article and Calenberg disambiguation page. The proposed name is in line with Wiki conventions and matches the de.wiki title for this article, Fürstentum Calenberg which means Principality of Calenberg.

Unless there are major objections I propose to move this to Principality of Calenberg. --Bermicourt (talk) 10:58, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Principality of Calenberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:59, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]