This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Health Service, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.National Health ServiceWikipedia:WikiProject National Health ServiceTemplate:WikiProject National Health ServiceNational Health Service articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hampshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hampshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HampshireWikipedia:WikiProject HampshireTemplate:WikiProject HampshireHampshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital articles
Oppose The issue is not about brands. This article is about a building - a hospital - which has had plenty of coverage in its own right (and therefore meets the criteria in WP:NBUILD) and where tens of thousands of babies have been born. Dormskirk (talk) 16:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But the hospital has been integrated into the UHS. The site is not distinct, just like the Southampton Childrens Hospital. Also, under Wikipedia:NBUILD, the building requires 'significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability', which it does not achieve as most information about the hospital is presented in conjuction with the other hospitals under UHS. Kpahijialmleisp (talk) 17:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see that: most of the coverage already cited refers to the "Princess Anne Hospital" not the "University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust". The Trust only secured foundation status in 2011, so it is not surprising that much of the coverage does not refer to it. Dormskirk (talk) 17:14, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]