Talk:Prince William Forest Park

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Prince William Forest Park article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Virginia Mid‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Still a stub

This article has two sections and three photos. Is it still really a stub? Thoughts? Mmoyer 03:15, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the WikiProjectVirginia quality scale. Since this article has some good sources, some photos, and substantial content, I think it is at least a "Start" quality, so I upgraded it from stub to start. Smiller933 (talk) 02:11, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

sasquatch

NESRA Sasquatch viewing area. ^[1]

I removed this, because honestly it hardly seems appropriate.

1) NESRA (the sasquatch people) have nothing to do with the park, and there is no NESRA presence (bigfoot viewing facilities, guided tours, etc.) in the part.

2) This is such a trivial part of such an extreme fringe that it doesn't bear mentioning. I'm all for including minority viewpoints and little known facts in the wikipedia, but even by bigfoot hunter standards, this is minor to the point of irrelevance. If they claim to turn up any kind of evidence, or draw some media attention, it should be reinstated by all means.

References

^ NESRA

[1] NESRA

[1]