This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
I come with this proposal for several reasons. First, while the article survived the AfD discussion with a keep, it is noteworthy that at least 3 out of 8 comments supported a redirect. Second, the contents of the article do not establish notability of the character. While he plays a main role in the film, and the film is notable itself, it should be noted that notability is not inherited. With appearances only in the film and related media, the contents can be merged into the List of Disney Prices. Thoughts? --LoЯd۞pεth00:28, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think that this idea is quite good. But I really think this character’s article, may make the page List of Disney princes a bit too long. By the way, I really think this character disserves his own article, or else I wouldn’t have written it. Thoughts? --Federollo (talk) 21:35, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I do not understand your position here. You think the merge is a good idea or do you think this should remain as a stand-alone? Anyway, the Wikipedia:Burden of evidence falls upon you, so you need to prove it meets notability if you want it to remain as an individual article. Neither this article nor the List of princes are too long, the List of Princes is 17000+ bytes, and this is not even 2000 bytes long. Wikipedia:Article size states that articles over 80000 are considered long. --LoЯd۞pεth02:14, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I redirected all contents of the page (including the appearances in parks and parades) into the list, since Notability was not established. --LoЯd۞pεth01:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]