Talk:Preservation metadata

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Digital Preservation

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Digital Preservation, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of digital preservation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Digital PreservationWikipedia:WikiProject Digital PreservationTemplate:WikiProject Digital PreservationDigital Preservation articles

Collections Care (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Collections Care, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Collections CareWikipedia:WikiProject Collections CareTemplate:WikiProject Collections CareCollections Care articles

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 January 2019 and 14 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mlekmoore.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:09, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

This definitely needs a bit of clean-up to at least meet the quality level of many preservation metadata-related pages available. That is, given the importance of preservation metadata to the topic of digital archiving, at the least this page should incorporate the issues brought in from other articles such as the the PREMIS and DublinCORE article. --Lyc. cooperi (talk) 11:36, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Review for UMD Intro to Archives and Digital Preservation

The first sentence in the lead needs work. Rather than repeating the term preservation, it may be more appropriate to structure the first two sentences together. Citing preservation metadata as data and information which include technical and historical information about information objects which enable sustainability of documents. (or something of that ilk) Also, the lead could stand a little bit more of a build out.

The lists in the Preservation Metadata section seem a bit too vague, particularly in the terms provenance and in the list of metadata methods. Without prior knowledge to these metadata methods, they may be lost on a reader.

In the "Uses" paragraph, I would move the citation before the pronunciation of AIPs.

[[Mlewis30 (talk) 14:33, 6 May 2019 (UTC)]][reply]