Talk:Presbyterian Church of Aotearoa New Zealand

	Reformed Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reformed Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Reformed Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Reformed ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject Reformed ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject Reformed ChristianityReformed Christianity articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Presbyterian Church of Aotearoa New Zealand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130322034721/http://www.presbyterian.org.nz:80/for-parishes to http://www.presbyterian.org.nz/for-parishes

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:01, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible neutrality issue?

The section titled 'Breakway groups' appears to be written to persuade the reader that the New Zealand Presbyterian Church had fallen into apostasy and that a split was necessary; it presumes that the settlers found doctrines they did not expect. Combined with a lack of citations, this section could be more of an argument than an objective summary of splits in New Zealand presbyterianism. It may require a rewrite from someone who knows more about the topic. --Hazhk (talk) 22:41, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, as it stands it lacks neutrality and needs to be rewritten. The formation of the RCNZ was undoubtedly at least partially in response to (perceived) liberalism in the Presbyterian Church, but the Declaratory Act in itself could not reasonably be called liberal. However, the information in this paragraph is useful and I wouldn't want to see it deleted. St Anselm (talk) 02:39, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find any specific doctrines mentioned in secondary sources, but I have fixed the RCNZ paragraph. St Anselm (talk) 03:31, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"George Wallace (New Zealand)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect George Wallace (New Zealand) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 16#George Wallace (New Zealand) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay (talk) 14:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]