Talk:Premiership of Imran Khan

@SheriffIsInTown: I have not heard this speech, you can improve this article by hearing it. In my opinion title of this article should be changed because it describes the Khan’s vision and focus not his ministership.— Bukhari (Talk!) 09:56, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

@BukhariSaeed: It's because his prime ministership is only two days old, we only have his one speech to go by and that only contains vision so far but when he will actually start doing something, we will condense the speech and give more room to actual achievements. That's what my thought was when I created it. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 10:00, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• Imran Khan in Prime Minister's Office, Islamabad.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:52, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Really?

Sigh… @SheriffIsInTown stop using language like “bogus reasons” when I clearly specified that an economists opinion has to be put in due weight, one of WP’s main ground rules. It also violates WP:BLPBALANCE as it is the view of an uninvolved economist, which one can argue can receive a mention but not this much, I would kindly suggest you read the concept of how much due weight to certain viewpoints and also WP:PROPORTION. Titan2456 (talk) 01:58, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

With these violations of WP policies, I might have to ask a recently active admin for implementation of WP:DUEWEIGHT. Titan2456 (talk) 02:01, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

I strongly disagree with your assertion that the inclusion of this content violates any of the policies you’ve mentioned. Mian is a globally recognized economist, and his criticism is directly related to important economic issues faced by Khan’s government, like the balance of payments crisis and stagnant growth. The section already talks a lot about Khan’s economic reforms and successes, making sure the criticism is placed in a balanced context. The amount of space given to Mian’s views is appropriate, as it’s a small part of a wider, detailed overview, offering a balanced perspective without dominating the other points. This follows Wikipedia’s rules about neutrality and fairness. Additionally, this content was added by Canned Knight and I support its inclusion, indicating that it carries consensus. While admins typically do not engage in consensus-building but I would welcome if an admin is willing to step in and provide their opinion so we can effectively resolve this issue. It is frustrating to see that you continue to censor any information you find critical of Khan and his party under the pretext of these policies. Such actions are not conducive to building a neutral and comprehensive encyclopedia. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 04:46, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

I acknowledge Mian is a significant economist, that is why I didn’t remove it entirely, but reduced it for weight. Also, consensus does not work like that. I will address the issue that I am having in a civil manner and hope you understand:

The main issue is that a lot of due weight issues going on between us two as editors. The opinion piece you added by Catherine Bennett is undue for a large whole paragraph on the Imran Khan BLP and a lot of information on the premiership section of the BLP is too much for a summary, the reason for the thread opened on that page is so that I can reach an agreement and work with you on how to fix the summary rather than editing on our own, resulting in an edit war. The corruption section on Imran Khan’s page still doesn’t mention any of his efforts that have been confirmed by RS. It would be better to stick to upfront, prominent facts and statistics for pages like this, rather than adding opinions either positive or negative, as there are hundreds. If we follow this pattern, its an endless loop of adding positive and negative opinion pieces resulting in a newslike article with a false balance. Khan is the most popular figure across most polls including Gallup and other RS. This will be a back-and-forth cycle of saying each others’ edits bypasses GAN, so I think its better if an admin intervenes to reach a solution and decide which users’ proposed edits make it closer to GA. Titan2456 (talk) 23:35, 5 December 2024 (UTC)