Talk:Preise, Jerusalem, den Herrn, BWV 119/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Smerus (talk · contribs) 11:04, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Well written
[edit]Overall absolutely acceptable. Two quibbles which I would raise:
- History and words - 'Bach could count on the entire council (his employer) listening, and likely also civil servants' - 'probably' is better than 'likely' in colloquial English.
- Scoring and structure - I suggest adding 'the musicologist' or 'the editor' before 'Alfred Durr' so that it is clear where this is coming from.
Verifiable with no original research
[edit]Well sourced and cited as one would expect from this editor.
Broad in its coverage, Neutral
[edit]Exemplary on both counts and well-focussed.
Stable
[edit]No problems
Images
[edit]Appropriate images and clear tables
Summary
[edit]I have no problems in passing this for GA, but the editor might like to take a look at the two quibbles under "Well-written".--Smerus (talk) 11:04, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you, done, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:31, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Excellent, super article.--Smerus (talk) 11:37, 29 August 2015 (UTC)