Talk:Prehistory

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Prehistory article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Archaeology Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anthropology High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

History High‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from History of the world was copied or moved into Prehistory with this edit on 2008-04-22. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Text and/or other creative content from Timeline of human prehistory was copied or moved into Prehistory with this edit on 2008-04-22. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Prehistory of the United States

You would think that Prehistory of the United States would talk about the pre-Columbian era of human settlement because writing (AFAIK) did not exist within present-day US territory. However, it instead talks about geological time, with just a few sentences about when the first migrants entered the continent but nothing past that. That "prehistory" is a completely different topic than the "prehistory" in this article. Does this strike anyone as strange? —Lights and freedom (talk ~ contribs) 05:50, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, prehistory is human history prior to writing. The Prehistory of the United States appears to be about 'geological history'. Iskandar323 (talk) 10:31, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Iskandar323 Right now, it only focuses on the United States. If it were about all of North America, it would have to be edited to include info about Canada, Mexico, and Central America. —Lights and freedom (talk ~ contribs) 23:46, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Right, but creatures in the Jurassic period ignored modern nation-state boundaries, so yeah, while it should be expanded, trends apparent from paleontological digs in the USA will also apply to the rest of the continent. Iskandar323 (talk) 06:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Engvar

It's been pointed out that the article uses mixed Am/Br English. There has been no previous discussion that i can see, & this 2004 version had a "characterised", so it should be Br Eng. I'll adjust accordly, for what I can see. Johnbod (talk) 00:36, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This edit in late 2018 not only Americanised the language, but converted from BC/AD, which the article had been since 2001, to BCE. Needless to say, his edit summary mentioned neither of these. Fortunately this editor has not edited since last September. This should be reversed too. Johnbod (talk) 01:11, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]