Talk:Pramod Muthalik

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pramod Muthalik article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

India: Karnataka / Politics Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Hinduism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wish we didn't have to write about him

We're actually rewarding this guy with a page on Wikipedia? I know we have to but, it's so freakin sad. This jerk just wanted publicity and now he's immortalized. Damn damn damn. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.60.6.16 (talk) 19:38, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As long as the article is factual and encyclopedic, it does not violate Wikipedia policy though it might prick the conscience of some contributors but that is a different matter. 165.230.132.126 (talk) 23:02, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POV

The section "Latest Controversy" is strongly POV and expresses individual opinions about the subject. 165.230.132.126 (talk) 23:00, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rocker

I would like some experienced editor to add this content to the article.. DO change the content as you please, but the meaning should remain the same.

Latest Controversy :

Think Karnataka's famous moral policing brigade, Sri Rama Sene, actually believes in saving and protecting the 'culture' of India think again, as a media exposé has revealed the murky underbelly of the Pramod Muthalik-led party.

In a sting operation carried out by TV news channel, Headlines Today and Tehelka magazine, it was exposed that self-proclaimed protector of Indian culture Muthalik could be hired to spark off a riot or violence with a few bucks.

HT and Tehelka caught Muthalik on a hidden camera accepting money to hold riots. The operation was carried out with the help of a Tehelka reporter Push Sharma, who posed as a budding artist looking for quick publicity.

For the charge of Rs 60 lakhs, the Sene chief agreed to vandalise three art exhibitions in Karnataka and also offered to trigger riots in Muslim dominated areas of Bangalore and Mangalore.

Interestingly, Muthalik chose to keep himself away from the rent-a-riot operation as he had an image to keep up with.

Referrence:

http://news.oneindia.in/feature/2010/pramod-muthalik-expose-sri-rama-sene-money-riots.html http://beta.thehindu.com/news/national/article429401.ece http://www.bhatkallys.com/news/news.asp?aid=10552 http://www.breakingnewsonline.net/newswatch/2050-muthalik-caught-on-camera-demanding-bribe-to-stage-riot.html http://expressbuzz.com/cities/bangalore/muthalik%E2%80%99s-mantra-money-for-rioting/173381.html

Rocker 14:32, 14 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xxmkcxx (talk • contribs)

Journalist Pushp Sharma Delhi

Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page). : outlook.com; http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?282475 Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).: bhadas.com; http://bhadas4media.com/article-comment/10338-2013-04-13-10-13-07.html Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page). : mediadarbar.com; http://mediadarbar.com/13179/baba-ramdev-tens-due-to-pushp-sharmas-sting/ Pushp Sharma is a Delhi based investigative journalist. Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).:hindi.in.com ;http://hindi.in.com/latest-news/news/Cbi-Set-To-Handle-Case-Of-Missing-Baba-Ramdev-Guru-1667192.html

Investigative Journalist Delhi Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).: plus.google.com;https://plus.google.com/116770879974678013959/posts/b1PzwJC6iZK Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).:jharkhandtoday.co.in;http://jharkhandtoday.co.in/?p=2702

Date of Birth : 9 Jan 1971

Pushp is a Delhi based Journalist , formerly with Tehelka and Headlines Today he is working for like minded group of investigative journalism. Since he believes news industry prefers 'events centric' chaos. So he has deicded to work on non salable but sensitive issues.

He often keeps rocking nation by his unique style of journalism.

Apart from journalism he has his business interest and operates from his second home Chandigarh.

He is one who exposed Baba Ramdev in his Guru' disappearance case. Now CBI is hunting his Guru Swami Shankerdev. Baba Ramdev addressed media thrice and ran defamation campaign against Journalist Pushp Sharma on his channel Aastha and in his own magazine Yog Sandesh but finally he welcomed government' decision of CBI investigation in his Guru' disappearance case. In 2010 Pushp got praise for his expose Rent a Riot / Cash for Chaos, exposing Pramod Muthalik and his goons. Pushp was instrumental in exposing disgraced owner of Satyam computer Ramalinga Raju who was using illness as shield to avoid jail. He runs his blog .....

Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).http://pushpsharma1382.blogspot.com/

For his story Rent a Riot (Tehelka) Pushp got IPI Award (Viana) in 2012. Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).: Thehindu.com;http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ipiindia-award-for-tehelka-the-week/article2568418.ece Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).:freemedia.at;http://www.freemedia.at/home/singleview/article/two-media-outlets-share-ipi-india-award.html Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).: Tehelka.com; http://www.tehelka.com/rent-a-riot-cash-for-chaos/ Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).: Thehindu.com;http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/rama-sene-chief-aides-exposed-in-rentariot-sting-operation/article429401.ece Later he conducted sting on Ramalinga raju, disgraced CEO of satyam computers, caught in biggest corporate fraud scam Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page). http://archive.tehelka.com/story_main45.asp?filename=Ne190610sick_man.asp

In 2009 Pushp faced a fake case by Delhi police which is unique in its own since both 'witness' are planted by police. Both are resident of police line, in spite of the fact they took him in custody in public place at 11AM where hundreds of people were around. But miraclously police got Two police line residents to support claims and show how credible is the case!!!!!!!

Police booked him in a case, giving messege in court that complainent is an accused so he and his work cant be credible. But it didnt stand in court of law. The FIR is funny story and it was never taken seriously in media fraternity since Indian police is known for such corrupt practice. Now same cops are facing charges of "Evidence destruction and registering Fake FIR". Main accused SHO ved Prakash didnt give any credible answer after being caught. SHO Ved Prakash is facing serious charges of being close to anti nationals. What happened after that has remained a subject of rage and fury, allegations and denials, claims and counter claims. But the case is in court and soon the verdict shall come. When Baba Ramdev found he is getting heat in his Guru Swami Shankerdev disappearance case then kept mentioning about this case to defend himself. Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).: bharatswabhimansamachar.in;http://www.bharatswabhimansamachar.in/conspiracy-with-malicious-intent-outlook-ibn7-are-hand-in-glove-with-a-proclaimed-offender-and-powerful-government-machineries-to-defame-baba-ramdev/ Ramdev tried to defend himself. Though he is paradoxical in his statement as when Delhi police beaten up his followers during Ramleela Ground Anshan. He called DELHI POLICE brutal. But when same Delhi police lodged FIR against journalist then same Delhi police is considered HONEST. Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).: mediadarbar.com; http://mediadarbar.com/13179/baba-ramdev-tens-due-to-pushp-sharmas-sting/ पुष्प शर्मा के स्टिंग ऑपरेशन से बौखला गए बाबा रामदेव Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).: bhadas4media.com;http://bhadas4media.com/vividh/6054-2012-10-07-07-02-11.html जिन पत्रकार पुष्प शर्मा पर रामदेव ने मढ़ा आरोप, उन पुष्प ने क्या खिलाए गुल... पढ़ें संपूर्ण स्टिंग आपरेशन की रिपोर्ट... Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).:bhandafodindia.com;http://bhandafodindia.com/NewsByCat.aspx?ID=1 But when Centeral governement ordered for CBI inquiry in Missing guru case of Ramdev then he finally welcomed the CBI probe in his Guru' case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pushp1382 (talk • contribs) 09:54, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]