Talk:Practical Common Lisp

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Practical Common Lisp article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

I am not an authority on Lisp and my "review" of this excellent book was really an essay on general programming topics, not a book review. Therefore, the link to "Practical Common Lisp" at www.developerdotstar.com is misleading, and I have removed it. - Edward G. Nilges

1. Why this book is good introduction to Lisp programming language? - not any other? 2. How did it affect on something? 3. Criticism 4. Which parts of the ANSI Common Lisp standard this book doesn't describe? 5. Any recommendations of famous in programming world people? Institutes? Etc. 6. History Sorry for my English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.252.227.61 (talk) 11:41, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]