Talk:Power Macintosh 7100

Apple Inc. Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Sagan/BHA/LAW?

Are there sources that say definitively that BHA means "Butt-head astronomer", and "LAW" means "Lawyers Are Wimps"? Or was this leaked out and rumored? If (as I believe) the truth is the latter, then we shouldn't be so definitive in the article about the meanings of the acronyms (e.g. "purportedly", "rumored to be"). -- 75.144.159.89 (talk) 16:07, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That "BHA" did mean "Butt Head Astronomer" among Apple coders was the entire raison d'etre of Sagan's lawsuit, and dryly reported as such by Time, inter alia, along with the famous reference of the judge: "one does not seriously attack the expertise of a scientist using the undefined phrase ‘butt-head’." (ibid.). The thing started with Sagan contemporaneously determining as a fact that BHA meant the phrase; it didn't mysteriously appear after, in Apple employee acronym jargon, as a replacement. As for "LAW", it appears matter-of-factly after "BHA" in online copies of the 7100 spec sheets, along with Gestalt ID number and other incredibly boring and uncontroversial tidbits. Its connection with the phrase comes as early as the year of the suit itself, and is also noted almost equally matter-of-factly, eg. Owen W. Linzmayer, The Mac Bathroom Reader,1994:

"They settled on LAW, which stands for Lawyers Are Wimps. Nonetheless, in the third week of April 1994, Sagan sued Apple..." p.243. [Google Books]

To get any better documentation about these things, we'd have to examine the court records, but as far as I'm concerned the matter is established. JohndanR (talk) 19:42, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I seem to remember that the lawsuit was actually not about Sagan seeming to endorse the product, but rather that the code names of the other two initial PowerPC machines (the 6100 and 8100) were "Piltdown Man" and "Cold Fusion"—notorious scientific frauds. Sagan supposedly objected to the implication that he himself was a fraud. But I don't have any citations for that. Jerry Kindall (talk) 02:25, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]