Talk:Powder Blue (film)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:50, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Powder Blue (film) → Powder Blue — Relisted. Ucucha 20:16, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be the only topic on Wikipedia known as "Powder Blue" (both words capitalized); Powder Blue is currently a disambiguation page listing only this film and Powder blue (the color). I am therefore suggesting that the film article be located at Powder Blue, with a hatnote linking to Powder blue. (Powder blue already has a hatnote link to this article, not to the disambiguation page; the only incoming links to the disambiguation page are intended to link to this film.) Propaniac (talk) 13:39, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose it should redirect to the colour. 70.29.208.247 (talk) 03:51, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. No need for a dab page for only two topics. (And if there were, the film would be the primary topic with 3-4 times the pageviews.) Station1 (talk) 05:38, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment it is not the primary use of the term "powder blue". And pageviews do not show "primary topic" either. Wikipedia is not the world at large. 70.29.208.247 (talk) 05:30, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Nobody's talking about the primary use of the term "powder blue"; we're discussing the primary use of the term "Powder Blue." Propaniac (talk) 20:19, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not the primary use of the term. That would be the colour. Skinsmoke (talk) 18:20, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It would seem to make more sense to redirect Powder Blue to the color and add a hat to the color page here as the color is the primary topic IMO. BOVINEBOY 2008 :) 16:00, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Color names don't usually have all their words capitalized in my experience, and the proposed name would still be unique. I have no problem with using capitalization to distinguish pages. --Cybercobra (talk) 07:18, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - dabbing by case alone is a bad idea. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 22:26, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.